The existing research indicates that most psychotherapy patients are open to having their sessions recorded, especially when presented with clear benefits. While some patients may initially hesitate, particularly those with heightened paranoia or discomfort being recorded, most adjust quickly. One study found patients benefited from being able to relisten to recordings between appointments. Patients reported it improved their recall, understanding of the sessions, and engagement in treatment. At Yung, we provide written session summaries for clients, which takes less time to review than full recordings. Most therapists also endorse overall positive attitudes towards using recordings for patient review and clinical supervision. Overall, the research suggests session recording is well accepted by most patients and therapists and feasible to implement as a standard practice. The evidence indicates it is beneficial for the therapy process when done appropriately. While more studies on optimal methods are warranted, the findings support the acceptability and utility of recordings. We suggest presenting the option to clients as follows: "Would you be interested in receiving an Al-generated summary report after our sessions? This would require recording the session, but you would get a take-home overview of our discussion." This frames the choice around the client benefiting from the report, rather than just easing your own note-taking. Only clients opting-in would be recorded, rather than requiring consent from all. The researches mentioned in this answer: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioural-and-cognitive-psychotherapy/article/abs/recording-therapy-sessions-an-evaluation-of-patient-and-therapist-reported-behaviours-attitudes-and-preferences/16EF3C8B7824AFE8D2C3D49D988E5636 https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-05588-003 https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/epdf/10.1176/ajp.112.9.731